|
|
Post by rockandrollmyworld on Apr 29, 2006 17:06:35 GMT -5
my jaw just cracked
|
|
|
|
Post by St. Jimmy on Apr 29, 2006 18:02:29 GMT -5
*sighs*
|
|
|
|
Post by Iero Love on Apr 29, 2006 18:02:53 GMT -5
*is bored*
|
|
|
|
Post by St. Jimmy on Apr 29, 2006 18:03:38 GMT -5
*sighs again*
|
|
|
|
Post by rockandrollmyworld on Apr 29, 2006 19:08:51 GMT -5
*wiggles nose*
|
|
|
|
Post by Iero Love on Apr 29, 2006 19:14:45 GMT -5
*sniffs air for no apparent reason*
|
|
|
|
Post by rockandrollmyworld on Apr 29, 2006 19:17:30 GMT -5
I've been thinking this for a while....isn't "converse" plural? I know it doesn't matter, but I feel like the plural of converse is not converses, because converse refers to a pair, which is plural....
|
|
|
|
Post by Phankam on Apr 30, 2006 13:30:47 GMT -5
Converse refers to the brand of the shoes.... so the shoes are mistakenly called converses =/ the appropiate way to call em would be "chucks" since they're the Chuck Taylor kind of converse.......
in chile we call em Converse =P i think i'm the only freak around that calls em Chucks lol
|
|
|
|
Post by rockandrollmyworld on Apr 30, 2006 13:55:05 GMT -5
that's not exactly what I was asking.....but yeah, I know that what we call converse are actually Chucks
|
|
|
|
Post by Phankam on Apr 30, 2006 14:05:47 GMT -5
meh yeah i know what you were asking. But still, just felt like being weird and explaining *shrugs*
|
|
